<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Ingenious Wave Security Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlewavesecurity.com/googles-ingenious-wave-security-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlewavesecurity.com/googles-ingenious-wave-security-model/</link>
	<description>Google Wave Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:41:19 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kylie Batt</title>
		<link>http://googlewavesecurity.com/googles-ingenious-wave-security-model/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Kylie Batt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlewavesecurity.com/?p=32#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Да, своевременно ответить, это важно...&lt;/strong&gt;

только &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intermost.ru/contents/50/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt; средств (Not the CLIENT, specifically, but the extensions Google made to the XMPP PROTOCOL.)
Usually security is done one way, in just [.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Да, своевременно ответить, это важно&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>только <a href="http://www.intermost.ru/contents/50/" rel="nofollow"> </a> средств (Not the CLIENT, specifically, but the extensions Google made to the XMPP PROTOCOL.)<br />
Usually security is done one way, in just [&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://googlewavesecurity.com/googles-ingenious-wave-security-model/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlewavesecurity.com/?p=32#comment-9</guid>
		<description>This article is a copy-paste from &lt;a href=&quot;http://jasonkolb.com/weblog/2009/09/googles-ingenious-wave-security-model.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jasonkolb.com/weblog/2009/09/googles-ing...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or the other way around :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is a copy-paste from <a href="http://jasonkolb.com/weblog/2009/09/googles-ingenious-wave-security-model.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://jasonkolb.com/weblog/2009/09/googles-ing.." rel="nofollow">http://jasonkolb.com/weblog/2009/09/googles-ing..</a>.<br />Or the other way around <img src='http://googlewavesecurity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JNFerree</title>
		<link>http://googlewavesecurity.com/googles-ingenious-wave-security-model/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>JNFerree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlewavesecurity.com/?p=32#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Dian. Isn&#039;t there still the issue of the URU status? As Waves become more ingrained into the Enterprise or the millions smaller gatherings, how will I be able to determine (on the fly) if the person I want to add to the (main) Wave or a specific Wavelet is 100% credentialed to the degree needed to share confidential info?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Dian. Isn&#39;t there still the issue of the URU status? As Waves become more ingrained into the Enterprise or the millions smaller gatherings, how will I be able to determine (on the fly) if the person I want to add to the (main) Wave or a specific Wavelet is 100% credentialed to the degree needed to share confidential info?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
